Warning: Declaration of MyAuthPlugin::initUser(&$user) should be compatible with AuthPlugin::initUser(&$user, $autocreate = false) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php on line 37
Warning: session_name(): Cannot change session name when session is active in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/Setup.php on line 222
Warning: session_set_cookie_params(): Cannot change session cookie parameters when session is active in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/GlobalFunctions.php on line 2446
Warning: session_cache_limiter(): Cannot change cache limiter when session is active in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/GlobalFunctions.php on line 2451
Warning: Parameter 1 to MediaWiki_TIGAutoAuthenticate() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/Hooks.php on line 117
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/Feed.php on line 125
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10 http://beta.aalf.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=User%3AMufinellaConte45User:MufinellaConte45 - Revision history2026-11-02T01:40:36ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.13.3http://beta.aalf.org/wiki/index.php?title=User:MufinellaConte45&diff=30062&oldid=prevMufinellaConte45: New page: For the duration of a dui investigation, cops will often administer a number of so-called "field sobriety tests" (FSTs). This may include a battery of three to five tests, frequently selec...2012-03-22T07:16:06Z<p>New page: For the duration of a dui investigation, cops will often administer a number of so-called "field sobriety tests" (FSTs). This may include a battery of three to five tests, frequently selec...</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>For the duration of a dui investigation, cops will often administer a number of so-called "field sobriety tests" (FSTs). This may include a battery of three to five tests, frequently selected by the officer; these can sometimes include walk-and-turn, one-leg-stand, horizontal gaze nystagmus, fingers-to-thumb, finger-to-nose, Rhomberg (modified position of attention), alphabet recitation, or hand-pat. Within an increasing amount of police force agencies in [http://www.duiattorneyorangecountyca.com/ DUI Lawyer Orange County], California and throughout the nation, a "standardized" battery of three tests will soon be given - walk-and-turn, one-leg-stand and nystagmus - and they must be scored objectively rather than utilizing an officer's subjective opinion.<br />
<br />
How valid are these FSTs? Not very, according to [http://www.duiattorneyorangecountyca.com/ DUI Lawyer Orange County CA] Taylor, a former prosecutor and the author of the leading legal textbook "Drunk Driving Defense, 6th edition". The tests are fundamentally "designed for failure". In 1991, Taylor reports, Doctor Spurgeon Cole of Clemson University conducted a report on the accuracy of field sobriety tests. His staff videotaped 21 individuals performing 6 common field sobriety tests, then showed the tapes to 14 police and asked them to decide if the suspects had "had a lot to drink to drive. " Not known to the officers, the blood-alcohol concentration of each of the 21 subjects was. 00%. The results: 46% of times the officers gave their opinion that the subject was too inebriated to drive. In other words, the FSTs were barely more accurate at predicting intoxication than flipping a coin. Cole and Nowaczyk, "Field Sobriety Tests: Are They Created for Failure? ", 79 Perceptual and Motor Skills 99 (1994).<br />
<br />
Think about the brand new, improved "standardized" DUI tests? Research funded by the National Highway Traffic Administration determined that the three most effective field sobriety tests were walk-and-turn, one-leg stand, and horizontal gaze nystagmus. Yet, even using these supposedly more accurate -- and objectively scored -- tests, the researchers unearthed that 47% of the subjects who would have been arrested based upon test performance actually had blood-alcohol concentrations of significantly less than the legal limit. Quite simply, almost 1 / 2 of all persons "failing" the tests weren't legally intoxicated by alcohol!<br />
<br />
In line with the [http://www.duiattorneyorangecountyca.com/ Orange County DUI Attorney]lawyers in Mr. Taylor's Southern California law firm, the fact that these tests are largely unfamiliar to many people, and they get under exceptionally unfortunate circumstances, make sure they are more difficult for people to perform. As few as two miscues in performance can lead to an individual being classified as "impaired" because of alcohol consumption when the problem may actually be the results of unfamiliarity with the test.</div>MufinellaConte45