Warning: Declaration of MyAuthPlugin::initUser(&$user) should be compatible with AuthPlugin::initUser(&$user, $autocreate = false) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php on line 37
Warning: session_name(): Cannot change session name when session is active in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/Setup.php on line 222
Warning: session_set_cookie_params(): Cannot change session cookie parameters when session is active in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/GlobalFunctions.php on line 2446
Warning: session_cache_limiter(): Cannot change cache limiter when session is active in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/GlobalFunctions.php on line 2451
Warning: Parameter 1 to MediaWiki_TIGAutoAuthenticate() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/Hooks.php on line 117
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/Feed.php on line 125
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10 Dan Thies - Revision history
http://beta.aalf.org/wiki/index.php?title=Dan_Thies&action=history
Revision history for this page on the wikienMediaWiki 1.13.3Sun, 01 Nov 2026 17:17:21 GMTDanThies: New page: John Moo replied in another discussion and they noted that We should begin a new forum thread.Both the sites got UNL messages in Webmaster Tools. I find this weird, as neither site benefit...
http://beta.aalf.org/wiki/index.php?title=Dan_Thies&diff=59659&oldid=prev
<p>New page: John Moo replied in another discussion and they noted that We should begin a new forum thread.Both the sites got UNL messages in Webmaster Tools. I find this weird, as neither site benefit...</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>John Moo replied in another discussion and they noted that We should begin a new forum thread.Both the sites got UNL messages in Webmaster Tools. I find this weird, as neither site benefited from spammy backlinks since I've owned them.By using backlink-viewing tools , like ahrefs I can see a lot of profile backlinks pointing at both websites, but I didn't put those links there. Additionally, I have, for years, warned people not to buy into blog networks, profile link spam, paid text links. And it is easy for a spam peddler to add questionable backlinks pointing anybody's website, since making spam is what they do every day.Thus far, neither urls appears to be adversely affected by links, and in this situation, getting traffic coming from Google isn't especially important relative to the large audience I already have. I did create reconsideration emails for both websites since a Google employee suggested it, however that other unanswered questions remain :What actions can a site owner undertake the moment that something like this occurs?Can the big search engines still say that things other people undertake on the web shouldn't ,uh, affect the SERP positions of someone elses site?If it's the case, does Google understand that they are actually creating the black market that benefits the spammy backlinks that Google wants to stop?Why is it, should you run across these types of backlinks, don't you just devalue them from the engine and move on?It's less crucial to many of us, to gain relief for these issues. It is vastly more meaningful to webmasters that someone fix these problems , as it will only get worse.<br />
<br />
Look there for more: [http://www.seofaststart.com/ Dan Thies]</div>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:40:45 GMTDanThieshttp://beta.aalf.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Dan_Thies