Warning: Declaration of MyAuthPlugin::initUser(&$user) should be compatible with AuthPlugin::initUser(&$user, $autocreate = false) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php on line 37

Warning: session_name(): Cannot change session name when session is active in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/Setup.php on line 222

Warning: session_set_cookie_params(): Cannot change session cookie parameters when session is active in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/GlobalFunctions.php on line 2446

Warning: session_cache_limiter(): Cannot change cache limiter when session is active in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/GlobalFunctions.php on line 2451

Warning: Parameter 1 to MediaWiki_TIGAutoAuthenticate() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/Hooks.php on line 117

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/Feed.php on line 125

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/extensions/DDNAuthPlugin.php:4) in /home/tig/www/aalf/www/wiki/includes/WebResponse.php on line 10
http://beta.aalf.org/wiki/index.php?title=LeilaElbert527&action=history Revision history for this page on the wiki en MediaWiki 1.13.3 Sun, 01 Nov 2026 15:54:12 GMT http://beta.aalf.org/wiki/index.php?title=LeilaElbert527&diff=16569&oldid=prev <p>New page: This is this introduction to a few articles designed we could some idea of things know about consider when confronted with flop decisions within hold 'em. The reason for this introduction ...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>This is this introduction to a few articles designed we could some idea of things know about consider when confronted with flop decisions within hold 'em. The reason for this introduction is in part to stand for a reference for some of the concepts I employ in the line, as well as act as a form of disclaimer; No article and also book on poker is going to be complete and full-covering, and for stringency it's important to declare where this limits are pulled.<br /> Basic Analysis Strategy<br /> <br /> To help us choose the best action to get, I'm going to help mostly be while using the Fundamental Theorem involving Poker. If you're not familiar with it, it - for the purpose of this series, at least - basically means this: Whoever makes the fewest and smallest costly mistakes will be the one who sales. It applies especially to heads-up situations, which fits this series perfectly.<br /> <br /> Heads-up limit hold 'em can be a battle of mistakes. By &quot;mistake&quot; Air cleaner will add putting in money when you shouldn't, and failing to do money when it is best to. If you can usually get your opponent to include money when he or she shouldn't, you'll profit. If you can avoid investing in money when you shouldn't, he won't.<br /> <br /> When [http://www.playpokeronline.com play poker online for money ] boils down to a showdown of mistakes, hand reading is vitally important. Since we'll only usually have one street worth of information (preflop), and on top of this my examples are from internet poker rooms, we'll have to settle for a mathematical approach based on percentages given just by PokerTracker stats (see below). If we don't have even that much (&quot;playing next to an unknown&quot;) we have to base our actions on what the average player is much like and act accordingly.<br /> Limitations<br /> <br /> The heads-up circumstances are presuming which only two players watch a flop, not there are only two players at the table. This is fundamental distinction because in the effects it has on the possible side ranges. See below regarding blind steals.<br /> <br /> Except otherwise stated, I presume that this opponent in that examples I show is a decent - not expert, not awful - player. Know about mistakes that such a player will get include being a touch too loose preflop, a little too loose on that flop, bluff labor and slowplay many times.<br /> <br /> Blind steals are certainly not included. The goal of the articles is to illustrate aspects to consider when two real hands are against each other to the flop. In a steal situation, one or both players will often have nothing, and even weak nothings. Knowing how to play in these situations is important, but is not a part of the scope from this series. See this Shades Stealing article for an introduction to shades steals.<br /> Concepts Made use of<br /> Pot odds<br /> <br /> You have to know what this is usually, and not just when it comes to limit hold 'em fail decisions. There are generally two articles at CardsChat. com that discuss pot odds:<br /> <br /> Poker Odds With regard to Dummies<br /> <br /> Concept: Pot Odds<br /> Equity<br /> <br /> An additional fundamental concept. Begin to see the Poker: Equity article for an introduction to collateral.<br /> Donkbet<br /> <br /> In restrict hold 'em, certainly in heads-up containers, the preflop raiser will virtually always create a continuation bet. Consequently, many players love to check-raise (or just smooth-call) right after they flop something superior, and, for reasons I will not speculate concerning, when a player instead decides to bet in the preflop raiser, could potentially be called a &quot;donkbet&quot; or even &quot;donking the failures. &quot; As some sort of sidenote, the term works for any turn and river to boot - it quite simply means betting into whoever maintain a pool of initiative. This, not surprisingly, can only be achieved by the player using position.<br /> Free card account<br /> <br /> There are two different free business cards plays, both requiring position: Opting not to bet in position relating to the flop to see a cheap turn, and betting the fail, leaving open the option to check behind on the turn to begin to see the river.<br /> PokerTracker numbers<br /> Some reads are presented as pokertracker stats, e. g. &quot;35/12/1. 5&quot; together with these numbers mean, respectively: VP/PFR/AF.<br /> <br /> VP: Volountarily put profit pot. A percentage indication of how loose the player is preflop. This value fails to automatically equal &quot;number of flops seen&quot; since a player checking the BB do not get &quot;points&quot; about this scale.<br /> PFR: Preflop increase. Percentage of hands this player has raised with preflop.<br /> AF: (Postflop) Violence Factor. Sum of bets and lifts, divided by number of calls, i. e. a ratio. The following ratio, as the name implies, says something precisely how passive or aggressive a player is.<br /> <br /> In order to properly understand the numbers, it will help to have some concept of what &quot;normal&quot; enjoy means. At 6-max event tables, good players usually range from 20/14/2. 5 to 30/20/1. 8. Note that VP and PFR usually go hand in hand as they increase, whereas the postflop violence factor usually goes down with an increased VP. The reason for AF going down is simply that good players will not put in the maximum amount of money when they're associated with as when they're ahead of time, and a looser player are going to be behind after the flop more often than a firmer player. A semi-loose player usually ranges VP 30% - 40%. Loose people around 40%-50%, and there's the &quot;fun&quot; people who play 50-60% within their hands. Once within a blue moon, you see a player who'll literally play just about every hand, but they're so rare that trying dissect hands that contain such players will not only be worthwhile*.<br /> <br /> There are actually, of course, other ways a person can be a winning player without having to be specifically within the range of stats My partner and i list above. Nevertheless they're the exemption, not the norm - and typically of thumb, if someone deviates by the fair margin with these numbers, you can be pretty sure that they're making mistakes somewhere, and we will discuss ways to exploit those mistakes over the flop. Having claimed that, stats can be argued indefinitely, but this is not the focus of this series.<br /> <br /> One other stat that i will sometimes examine is WTSD which stands for &quot;Went To Showdown&quot; and it is a percentage showing how often a certain player, as soon as she sees some sort of flop, actually gets to showdown. This is kind of the postflop equivalence of VP; how loose a gamer is once they attempt to continue preflop. As with AF, this value provides different meanings subject to VP. Someone who sees lots of flops, would do well not to attend showdown very quite often. Someone who : and I take the extreme case - folds every thing but AA and KK would do well to go to showdown virtually usually. A certain cost of WTSD isn't &quot;good&quot; or &quot;bad&quot; without attention, it's a product or service of how loosely you play preflop.</div> Tue, 06 Mar 2012 01:03:10 GMT LeilaElbert527 http://beta.aalf.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:LeilaElbert527